A protection racket in PA
From AP:
Woman jailed because of record mixup
YORK, Pa. — A mistake in court records led to a two-night jail stay for a woman being investigated by police for playing music too loud.
Andrea Conn, of Windsor, was jailed Saturday night after an officer looking into the noise complaint discovered she was wanted for failing to appear in court in 2003.
But the warrant should not have been in the county’s system because it was taken care of that year, York County Prothonotary Pamela Lee said Wednesday.
That kind of screw up is bad enough, but it happens. But just like in a black & white Mob crime drama, it appears that in PA if you want safety from abuse and harassment you have to pay for it. That warrant that landed Ms. Conn in jail was for failure to pay the court costs involved in seeking a protection-from-abuse order.
This is the second time she has been tossed in jail for failing to turn over the money. She served time four years ago because she didn’t have it - she only was released when someone paid it for her.
From the Chester Co. PA website:
IS THERE A COST FOR FILING FOR A PROTECTION FROM ABUSE ORDER?
Yes.
There are costs that must be eventually paid when you file a protection from abuse order with the court. You will not have to pay any fees at the time of filing. However, at the time of the hearing the court will order either the alleged assailant to pay the costs, you pay the costs, the costs to be split by both parties. If you are successful and the court grants you the protection from abuse order, the costs are usually placed upon the alleged assailant. The court costs must be paid even if you choose to withdraw your petition and decide not to proceed with the case. If you do not appear at your scheduled hearing your case will be dismissed and the court will hold you responsible for all costs.
Just how much are those fees? $123.50. That’s over 22 hours at minimum wage, better than half a week’s pay.
Whether the one seeking protection is the one to pay the fees is at the discretion of the judge. Should the petitioner decide not to pursue it, as many women do for a variety of reasons, including fear or intimidation, having no money to support herself or having nowhere to go, she always has to pay it. She’s penalized for making a failed attempt, money she may not have.
Sounds like a deterrent against filing to me. We wouldn’t want the state to get stuck protecting a vulnerable citizen from abuse without getting paid for it.
So far, all Ms Conner is asking for is an apology for the warrant not being cleared. I think she deserves much more than that. Much of that she should have received four years ago.



