Is this Ohio 2009 or Mississippi 1963?
Ohio teen sentenced in parking lot noose attack
MOUNT VERNON, Ohio – A central Ohio teenager accused of putting a noose around a Hispanic boy’s neck and dragging him in a parking lot has been sentenced to 10 days in jail.
The 18-year-old was sentenced Wednesday in juvenile court in Mount Vernon, a city of 15,000 residents an hour’s drive northeast of Columbus. He dropped his original plea of not guilty and pleaded no contest to ethnic intimidation.
A charge of aggravated menacing was dropped.
Seventeen-year-old Robert Cantu says in May 2008 he was dragged from a sidewalk to a parking lot with the noose wrapped around his neck by a group of teenagers shouting racial slurs. He says the teens threatened to hang him before a bystander intervened.
His family says it plans to sue the city, dubbed the state’s Most Livable Community in 1994.
This is so wrong – not just the crime, but also the news coverage.
- The victim is named but the criminal remains anonymous.
- The case was tried in Juvenile Court, for what appears to be misdemeanors. Why no hate crime charges, a felony?
- The crime was committed by a mob – only 1 perpetrator was tried.
- The perpetrator is referred to as a “teen.” Technically correct, but it downplays his responsibility for his crime.
- That’s not a “bystander,” by any definition. S/he didn’t “stand by.” That’s a hero.
- 10 days in the local jail for attempted lynching. That’s less that he would have served for possession of a beer.
1 Comment
One Response to “Is this Ohio 2009 or Mississippi 1963?”
Leave a Reply
Terry likes gravitars to personalize comments. Don't have one? Make one at gravatar.com!

You missed one: the “juvenile” is 18, at the age of majority, and should be treated as an adult under the law unless they are developmentally delayed or otherwise impaired. Not all teenagers are “children.”
I’m still not entirely happy about Federal hate crimes laws, but as long as localities and states pull lame stuff like this…. Ahistoricality(Quote)